MT vs. Skills-Based Resume Format?

Submitted by Dave Parkin
in

I am in the process of updating my resume as we are getting ready to shut our operation down. No worries, this was planned and I am on a retention package that keeps me pretty happy. I’ve been working for many years so my accomplishments and experience is extensive. I do keep it to 2 pages. I have an extensive technical career and will be looking for a leadership position like a manager, etc…  

My standard resume follows the MT plan but I have been approached recently by an industry leader with the suggestion of creating a Skills-Based format and am wondering about why this would help me. My MT resume is pretty straight forward and provides the chronological path I have had but it doesn’t push the management strengths I have. I don’t have any employment gaps so I am not trying to hide anything there.

I did create a Skills-Based resume. It was a challenge but helped me see the strengths I have in going into a full leadership position. The overall result seemed to create an active marketing document of myself and brand. This would work very well if I were presenting myself as a consultant which I will be looking into but I am not sure it would be used for the typical job application.

Any thoughts?

Submitted by Teague Sizemore on Monday April 28th, 2014 1:32 pm

 I think you should be selling yourself no matter what job you apply to, and it sets you apart with the resumes presented on Manager Tools.

Submitted by Dave Parkin on Thursday May 1st, 2014 3:07 pm

 
So I did the following…
Created a Skills/Functional resume and ported it all into my LinkedIn account and updated my Manager Tool type resume to clarify a few points. Now I have an introduction to use as a cover letter/email and the full force on the MT resume format.
 
I think this is just what I need.