What do you look for when assessing a status report

I'm trying to improve the way I read and analyse status reports and was hoping for some thoughts from the community. 

I see the purpose of reading a status report is to look for:

• RAG status
• Things that require action from me or my team
• Risks, issues, assumptions & dependencies that may affect me or my team
• Completeness and correctness of status
• Understanding the progress of key deliverables and when they will be delivered
• Keeping tabs on items under escalation

So the questions I ask: 

• Is the overall status correct (assuming a RAG status is present)
• Do the status items require action from me?
• Does this describe a risks or issues that requires attention?
• Are risks and issues being explicitly called out?
• Are the risks and issues being managed? If yes, managed appropriately
• Are the assumptions and dependencies being explicitly tracked? Are they complete / correct?
• Is the report itself complete and correct?
• Is there anything requiring an escalation or that may lead to an escalation

Anything other considerations?