I’ll be posting more book reviews on the site in the coming weeks and months, as Manager Tools starts its second year. (Happy Birthday, Mike!). Nearby this post is a re-print of an answer I provided to a member question, talking about reading and my habits related thereto.
You’ll note that I read 200 books a year, probably. I do this because I truly love to do it. Mike will tell you I’m pretty smart (and I will return the favor), but I just think I’ve read more than most people.
I’m writing this on an American flight to Chicago, and I read 3 Wall Street Journals waiting for the flight and at the gate. I have three books to read on this trip (3 days), and I will finish them all (and write about them, if they so merit).
Some things that might help you in reading my reviews.
1. I’m not predisposed to write favorably. Look, I’m a nice person, honest, but most business books just aren’t that good from my perspective (see 3 below).
And some books don’t pass muster from ANY perspective.
2. If I do like it, I’ll probably gush a little. You try reading 200 books a year when your history suggests that most are going to be duds. When I find one I like, well, I sing a little loudly.
3. I require good ideas, which I can actually use. I believe you buy business books to help you and your organization and your career. If I can’t figure out how a book will do that for most managers, how could I recommend it? It’s not enough, usually, to have a great idea, and I think this might disqualify me from a cocktail party of the big business writers, because they so often miss this. (My book will not miss this, though it may miss other targets. I may be accused of being too tactical.)
I am, nearly every sentence, asking, “Okay, but how can I USE this? What do you want me to DO?!?”
I recognize this is not the only way to evaluate a book, and certainly not the most scholarly of approaches. But then again, I’m not writing for scholars. I’m writing for YOU. Managers, and future managers.
4. My primary criteria is Recommend/Not Recommend. Since I’ve already read the book, and the only reason to write about it is to have you read my opinion, this seems to me to be the best criteria. I don’t want to keep track of star ratings or some other criterion. Pass/Fail. You’re too busy to read all these books TOO, when only one of us has to. Think of me as a different kind of filter than, but sharing a common respect for your time with, Executive Book Summaries (which I do not subscribe to, but have no problem with).
5. I really love great writing. If a book is well written, it’s a special joy. James Stewart, who wrote Den of Thieves, is a great writer. (It helps to have won a Pulitzer while editing the front page of the WSJ). Michael Lewis, who wrote Liar’s Poker, and Moneyball, is very good, though surely different than the erudite Mr. Stewart. Peter Drucker is better than both of them together, though for many of you he is an acquired taste. His prose is dense, which is often used as an aspersion, mistakenly. I really like Tom Friedman, too… and surprise, he’s won 3 Pulitzers.
6. I’d love to hear about your favorites. I’ll do my best to read them, and give you my opinion. Disagreements welcome. I’ll be wrong sometimes, maybe a lot. Don’t ask me to read a book on short notice to let you know whether you should buy it (it’s already happened).
7. I might mention non-business books. Usually they will stand out in some way, often with great writing. An Army At Dawn, by Rick Atkinson, which I read last year, is a good example: brilliant beyond compare.
And then there are books like The World is Flat.